Water on the Moon

Here is the explanation of water on earth and the moon from a materialistic atheist viewpoint. 

https://www.space.com/21047-earth-moon-water-meteorites.html

“Water deep inside Earth and the moon may originate from the same source: ancient (carbonaceous) meteorites, scientists say.”

Jeremy: The Bible refers to water under the earth in chambers, as the source of the worldwide Flood by asteroid impacts.

“Water is vital to life as we know it, with organisms found virtually everywhere there is water on Earth. When Earth was born, the ingredients of the planet's water most likely would have formed beyond the orbit of Earth. As such, all the water on the planet must have come from either comets or meteorites hurtling inward from the outer solar system.”

Jeremy: Strange, how come there is no life on the moon? Of course we KNOW life wasn’t created there! Well the Bible says he created life on earth and created two lights to shine on the earth.

Notice they Capitalize Earth, and do not capitalize the moon? Is it because the sun represents Baal the sun god symbolized in ancient Egypt as 666 i.e. Satan?

 

“The findings hint that water may have existed on Earth before the giant impact the planet received that created the moon, and that the moon possessed water from its earliest moments, scientists added. It remains a mystery exactly how water found within the moon survived this violent collision, though.”

Jeremy: Like soft dinosaur tissue and organic remains they have no explanation. And they give credit to a great impact to the creation of the moon instead of God. Of course there was water on both from the Beginning.

“Until recently, scientists thought the interior of the moon was bone-dry, originating as the moon did from the molten debris of a giant impact of a Mars-size protoplanet against Earth about 4.5 billion years ago. The heat of this collision should have baked all the ingredients of water out of the moon. However, five years ago, the first evidence of hydrogen was discovered in lunar samples from the Apollo missions. Hydrogen is a main ingredient of water, along with oxygen. [Water on the Moon: The Search in Photos]”

Jeremy: Odd some elements on the moon are rare on earth, and some common on earth are rare on the moon. And there is no crater that large on earth and how did the moon come together? Also to put something into orbit for a long time requires it to slow down and curve to create angular momentum a balance between motion, mass, and distance from the planet. This is why there are NO meteorites orbiting the earth.

https://answersingenesis.org/astronomy/moon/problems-for-giant-impact-origin-of-moon/

1.   Fission theory, invented by the astronomer George Darwin (son of Charles). Jeremy: Darwin was an Illuminated Mason part of the Torch Bearers of Lucifer.

2.   He proposed that the earth spun so fast that a chunk broke off, with the Pacific Ocean as the probable scar (or a modification of the theory that had the earth molten at the time). But this theory is universally discarded today. First, the moon is too chemically different from the earth; second, the earth could never have spun fast enough to throw a moon into orbit; and third, the escaping moon would have been shattered while within the Roche limit.

3. Capture theory — the moon was wandering through the solar system, and was captured by Earth’s gravity. But for one approaching body to enter into orbit around another, it would need to lose a lot of energy, which is why spacecraft sent to orbit other planets are designed with retro-rockets. Otherwise the approaching body would have been ‘slingshotted’ rather than captured, a phenomenon the Voyager probes exploited. Finally, even a successful capture would have resulted in an elongated comet-like orbit.

4. Condensation (or co-creation) theory — earth and moon formed at about the same time from the same portion of the swarm of planetesimals which supposedly orbited the sun in the early phases of the evolution of the solar system. However, it’s unlikely that the gravitational attraction could have been strong enough, and it doesn’t account for the moon’s low iron content.

The evolutionary astronomer Lissauer affirms that these three theories have insoluble problems.¹ He even cited an only half-joking statement in a university astronomy class about 20 years ago by Irwin Shapiro: since there were no good (naturalistic) explanations, the best explanation is that the moon is an illusion! This counts as strong evidence for the moon’s special creation.

Lissauer’s article was actually commenting on a paper⁴ supporting what evolutionary scientists consider a fourth promising hypothesis for the origin of the moon, developed during the past decade. It is called the Giant Impact Hypothesis. This hypothesis suggests that the proto-Earth and a Mars-sized protoplanet had a glancing collision 4.5 billion years ago. The moon subsequently formed from the ejecta. A variant of the hypothesis, the Impact-triggered Fission Hypothesis, propounds that, instead of one giant impactor, the moon formed from the debris of multiple impacts of smaller planetesimals. However, recent dynamical and geochemical analyses call the Giant Impact Hypothesis into question.

Computer models have been constructed to simulate such a giant impact. Although such computer models are simplified and depend too much on initial conditions, the results have strained the hypothesis to the breaking point. One of the new dynamical results is that the debris from the collision would rain back down onto Earth instead of remaining in orbit and forming the moon. To hurl the debris far enough from the earth, the impactor would need to be three times the size of Mars. The results of such a collision are hard to understand, much less model. And if the moon did form after such a collision, the orbit would likely be unstable with a distance of only 14,000 miles above the earth and circling it every two hours. Lissauer also noted the unsolved problem of losing the excess angular momentum.

          "With a good degree of certainty, we know that the water came to the moon and Earth from primitive meteorites now located in the outer parts of the asteroidal belt," said study lead author Alberto Saal, a geochemist at Brown University. He and his colleagues detailed their findings online today (May 9) in the journal Science.

Jeremy: Of course they do not mention that God created the earth from a ball of water on day one. Of course water MUST have come from outer reaches of the asteroidal belt that was garbage left over from the condensation of matter from the great explosion. By the way explosions do not produce design. And most astronomers believe that the asteroid belt was produced by the destruction of a planet. The Bible would agree, because debris floating in space is not created by design, but by destruction after the fall of Adam. I believe from meteoritics, geology, paleontology, history and the Bible this happened at the time of Noah’s Flood about 2348 BC.

“The simplest explanation for this commonality between the moon and Earth is that "the Earth from its birth had water," Saal told SPACE.com. "And it got to the moon during the giant impact without completely being lost by this event." After the moon-forming impact about 100 million years after Earth formed, our planet apparently did not receive significantly more water, he added.”

Jeremy: Of course, God created water on day one. And no more has been added except for ice meteorites which are very minor amount. One part per trillions of water atoms.